Archive | July 2015

This Quaker for a Coup

The Business Plot of 1933

In 1933 there was a plan by corporate interests, including JP Morgan Bank, in the United States to overthrow the government of Franklin Delano Roosevelt by coupd’etat and then subsequently reconstruct the United States in a fascist model like was the case with several other countries of during that era.

‘This plot failed.’

Yet only because a certain Pennsylvania Quaker son had the courage to speak out. For had he not done so we would have already been living under the heel of fascism for decades now and been raised – under their education programs.

Yes, this would have meant ‘Industrial (Residential) schools for ALL of us.’

‘You may never have known the difference.’


His name was Smedley Darlington Butler (July 30, 1881 – June 21, 1940)

In 1935, Butler wrote a book entitled War Is a Racket, where he described and criticized the workings of the United States in its foreign actions and wars, such as those he was a part of, including the American corporations and other imperialist motivations behind them.

At the time of his death the most decorated Marine in U.S. history.

In 1933, he became involved in a controversy known as the Business Plot, when he told a congressional committee that a group of wealthy industrialists were planning a military coup to overthrow Franklin D. Roosevelt, with Butler selected to lead a march of veterans to become dictator, similar to other Fascist regimes at that time. The individuals involved all denied the existence of a plot and the media ridiculed the allegations. A final report by a special House of Representatives Committee confirmed some of Butler’s testimony.


An adult male looking to the right in a military uniform; military ribbons are visible.


He became widely known for his outspoken lectures against war profiteering, U.S. military adventurism, and what he viewed as nascent fascism in the United States.


The McCormack-Dickstein Committee confirmed some of Butler’s testimony in its final report. “In the last few weeks of the committee’s official life it received evidence showing that certain persons had made an attempt to establish a fascist organization in this country…There is no question that these attempts were discussed, were planned, and might have been placed in execution when and if the financial backers deemed it expedient.”



The coup plotters were stayed. Yet they never went away. They sat waiting for a new opportunity…





Boot, Max (2003). The Savage Wars of Peace (First Paperback ed.). Basic Books. ISBN 0-465-00721-X. LCCN 2004695066.


Burk, Robert F. (1990). The Corporate State and the Broker State: The Du Ponts and American National Politics, 1925–1940. Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-17272-8.

“Gen. Butler Bares a ‘Fascist Plot'”. New York Times. November 21, 1934. p. 1.

Sargent, James E.; Archer, Jules (November 1974). “Review of: The Plot to Seize the White House, by Jules Archer”. The History Teacher (Society for History Education) 8 (1): 151–2. doi:10.2307/491493. JSTOR 491493.

Schlesinger Jr., Arthur M. (2003). The Politics of Upheaval: 1935–1936, The Age of Roosevelt, Volume III (The Age of Roosevelt). Mariner Books. ISBN 0-618-34087-4.





Hitler Jugend for this Generation

Many victims today have ended up becoming controlled by the same or similar kind of hate which was present in their oppressor(s). Though that person would declare to abhor this poison it yet lingers within them.

They have in effect they have received the poison of their former oppressor. Yet the poison most often takes a new shape or colour.  Yet this poison is not  sourced in any certain skin colour or nationality.  It is instead an anti-human spirit of death. All it takes is for one to invite this spirit in and it will begin to take over that person or people. Understand that this spirit has and can manifest in any person, people or land.



Another fallacy is the belief that it is a people group who have  or brought a painful catastrophy upon others can be responsible for repeating the same again.


Race Theory

Judeo-Christianity was not the origin of racism or race classifications.

Johann Friedrich Blumenbach (1752–1840) and Thomas Darwin



The potential for doing harm to our fellow human beings is not the exclusive domain of those examples we already know most well from history. They have been exposed already. The fertile ground for corruption is inherent ‘within each one of us.’


No one group is more susceptible to ill will than another. Each one of us struggle with our own prejudices. It is merely a question of how deeply one has been cross-examined; or whether we have had our feet put to the fire of testing or not.

Anyone who might find himself assuming that this robotisation can only happen to a particular nationality; or that one group is more likely to exhibit racism than other group of people.

To assume this is founded on a gravely mistaken premise.


Through repentance a person and nation can learn to turn about and correct their ways.

It is the person or nation who has not stumbled who are most ripe for inviting a road of harm into their hearts. Especially when that one is walking in pride and conceit.


Understand, this matter is not about racism at all. Instead, this is about the Spirit of Amalek.

The question is what happens when this spirit is invited by a person or people to dwell within the soul.


The Hidden Origins of the ‘Nazi Salute’


Rex Curry is mentioned in the book “Pledge of Allegiance & Swastika Secrets” by the author Ian Tinny. The book explains these breakthrough discoveries: (1) the Pledge of Allegiance was the origin of the Nazi salute and Nazi behavior, and (2) the swastika, although an ancient symbol, was also used by German socialists (Nazis) to represent crossed “S” letters for “socialism.”

The German socialist symbol was a type of cross, a “Hakenkreuz” (hooked cross); German socialists did not call it by its popular modern name “swastika.” The modern misnomer was used (and continues to be used) to cover up German socialism’s origin in American Christian Socialism, via Francis Bellamy (author of the Pledge of Allegiance) and his cousin Edward Bellamy (author of “Looking Backward” -the origin of the National Socialist movement).

Dr. Curry showed that the early Pledge of Allegiance began with a military salute that was then extended outward to point at the flag (thus the stiff-arm gesture came from the pledge and from the military salute).

The pledge was written by an American socialist who advocated “military socialism” and who influenced other socialists worldwide, including German socialists (the term “Nazi” is a deliberately misleading term, in that the “Nazis” did not call themselves “Nazis,” they called themselves “socialists”). The pledge was written for kindergartners to be forced to recite it in government schools (socialist schools) on command and in unison.

The pledge was the origin of similar robotic chanting imposed by other authoritarian governments.

The early pledge began with a military salute that was then extended outward to point at the flag (in practice the second gesture was performed palm down).

It was not an ancient Roman salute (that is a debunked myth).

It is the worship of government / socialism. The pledge caused bullying, violence, castrations, even lynchings. It continues to cause bullying.

Most Americans today were educated in socialist schools (government schools) so they are ignorant of the fact that it was happening in the USA (to the stars and stripes) and in Germany (to the swastika flag) at the same time. The pledge’s viciousness continues to happen here, only the gesture changed.

The pledge continues to be the origin of Nazi behavior even though the gesture was changed to hide the pledge’s putrid past. It is bizarre that it continues to exist (though the stiff-armed salute was altered) and that intelligent(?) adults have been duped into the mechanical propaganda chanting.
Credit: Rex Curry



It is time to do our research and move beyond easy categories, such as the race grouping zoology and Social Darwinism of the late 19th century, and instead affirm the ‘Image of the Creator’ present within every person.


Next Article:

The Spirit of Amalek & The Native American

National Socialist Phenomenon


Cloud for Controlling the Narrative


Everyone has heard of  ‘Cloud.’

Being promoted as THE way for storage.


Yet, what are the implications of using Cloud for us in the Near Future?


There has been a great amount of promotion of Cloud yet not a great of amount of understanding as to what storing ones information on Cloud will mean in the future.


The responsible and wise research investigates.

Q:  ‘Who manages Cloud’?

Cloud is about achieving ‘Information Monopolization’


It is also about ‘gatekeeping’


Very soon websites are going to be tied to serves of large corporations and universities; which have morphed into profit making ventures and left behind the goal of educating in the traditional sense.



‘GateKeeping’ ( where a publisher decides which stories get aired; and which do not)

‘Agenda Setting’ (this is where news is released with a particular goal of influencing viewers listeners in a certain direction ; not simple for the sake of informing an audience in a more neutral way or manner)



Many libraries in the West are being closed; or hardcopies are being replaces by Electronic copies of books; or reading rooms are being monitoring by cameras. The reasons? Costs savings and for your personal security we are told. This is for you to decide.


What is he Importance of Maintaining Hardcopies?

When everything is made into an Electronic version one can enter the server later on and manipulate the original text.

Yet if one retains hard-copy versions of books and these are spread out in various locations one cannot change the text without being challenged by those other hard-copies existent.



Algorithmic Examination of Movements and Interests


Closing the Doors to opposing viewpoints


From Asking to Telling


Downloading into you without asking


Controlling the Narrative


Closing down the social settings of the libraries and instead having you go online directly with Cloud.


Soon one will need a password to go online.


We see this coming with Google searches already

where one needs to enter a code in order to use their search engine.



Store your data offline; using cds; flashdrives; and other exterior hard-drives.

Remain in control of your own life.




Piecemeal Functionalism


Piecemeal Functionalism

Instead on quick, visible  and blatant regime change ‘Piecemeal Functionalism’ is a piece by piece clandestine implementation of a regime upon a country or society.


This is about the construction of a corporate superstate. This stealth superstate writes their own laws, and passes them through congress and parliament. Then simply build on top of whatever and whoever is there.


We are speaking about the superimposition of a technocratic corporate entity piecemeal upon the landscape of Turtle Island .


These changes include:

Staged Takeover

Management by Crisis

Eminent Domain


Suspending Civil Liberties through a ‘Red-Green Show’ :


Red – Use of Emergency Management

Green – Use of Environmental Language


Use of an electronic ‘cloud’ propiska /indian reserve lockdown system

Cellphones, Surveillance Cameras, GPS and Card Keys to track and monitor populations

Watching for any behavior dissident from the macroeconomic aims of a corporate superstate




This is a entity is really a modern amalgam of ancient Babylon, Egypt, Greece, Rome and Assyria – all rolled into one.








In this remapping of the continent people are removed or replaced much in the way that a spellchecker is programmed to remove ‘a spelling error’ on a word document.

Star Chamber for Canadian Complacency


  • The inquisition, the Star Chamber, have no place in a free society.

    (State of the Union Address. President Harry S. Truman,1953)



Finding its support from the king’s prerogative (sovereign power and privileges) and not bound by the common law, Star Chamber’s procedures gave it considerable advantages over the ordinary courts. It was less bound by rigid form; it did not depend upon juries either for indictment or for verdict; it could act upon the petition of an individual complainant or upon information received; it could put an accused person on oath to answer the petitioner’s bill and reply to detailed questions. On the other hand, its methods lacked the safeguards that common-law procedures provided for the liberty of the subject.


Credit: ©2015 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.


A cover depicting the Roderick Taylor produced 1983 movie ‘The Star Chamber’ depicting the notorious 17th Century English court, starring actor  Michael Douglas.



An illustration of the accused before the Star Chamber.



An illustration of the inside of the Star Chamber after it had been closed. ‘Not a bad idea.’


The Star Chamber Historically:


The Star Chamber’s Arbitrary use of power and the cruel punishments it inflicted produced a wave of reaction against it from Puritans, advocates of common-law courts, and others opposed to the reign of Charles I. In 1641 the Long Parliament abolished the court and made reparations to some of its victims.



adj. not supported by fair or substantial cause or reason. Most often it is used in reference to a judge’s ruling.


A court which formerly had great jurisdiction and power, but which was abolished by stat. 16, C. I., c. 10, on account of its usurpations and great unpopularity. It consisted of several of the lords spiritual and temporal, being privy counsellors, together with two judges of the courts of common law, without the intervention of a jury. Their legal jurisdiction extended over riots, perjuries, misbehaviour of public officers, and other great misdemeanors. The judges afterwards assumed powers, and stretched those they possessed to the utmost bounds of legality. 4 Bl. Com. 264.



Source: A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States. By John Bouvier. Published 1856.
 Unlike in England the Star Chamber will not be limited to the geometry of one room for judicial purposes but have the width of cyberspace to utilize in pursuing and sentencing those deemed ‘dissident’. This is the real ‘darkspace.’
Important implications:
Understand that C-51 inception was not Canada.  It is part of Homeland Security Protocol.  Homeland Security is the internal enforcement arm of the North American Forum for this continent. It is Rand Corporation policy in action. It is about protecting the infrastructure of an emerging ‘North American Union.’
The forming of a North American Union is not the will of the majority of Canadians.  Instead it is a clandestine and draconian remapping of this continent.  It is more Brave New World than it is English Common Law procedure.
The Role of the Canadian Senate:
Though not popular with many Canadians these days the Canadian Senate has a necessary role. The Senate is there as part of a check and balance system . The readings of bills in the senate afford time and sober judgement concerning any bills that are being introduced by parliament. Without a senate present to do those readings any parliament which is formed in the future can simply  shove through its own lobbied legislation. There would be no cross-examination for potential harmful bills or proper consideration given as to the unintended consequences of those same bills and their effect on the larger Canadian society afterwards.
The Future: If we should sleep in complacency and allow this C-51 Homeland Law ‘to sink in and become the norm’ we shall not see a benign human power rescue us from it in this lifetime; as was the case with the United States on behalf of an occupied Europe in freeing them from the fascism of Nazi Germany; and it’s Enabling Act in the 1930s to suppress its political opposition.
In a recent National Post article, canadaedge009, wrote:
“A Constitution and a Charter of Rights and Freedoms is the foundational document by which the citizens have their personal liberty and rights guaranteed and by which they can challenge a bad government. It isn’t something to be manipulated by a political party of any stripe, and it isn’t up for discussion unless a substantial majority of the people (70% or more) agree to change it. By passing laws in parliament that directly overturn the Constitution and the Charter, the government is actually engaging in their own form of ‘terrorism’. They are saying screw your rights, screw your concerns, we are doing this, and by the way, we can’t tell you why because it is ‘secret’. Even CSIS officials have testified that the current changes go beyond what is required for them to do their jobs. By the time this ‘law’ is brought before the Supreme Court for a ruling, the damage will be done and the law breakers will be long gone or conveniently ‘hidden’.”
The attitude “It isn’t adversely affecting me so what’s the big deal.” We must find the courage and initiative advance beyond this kind of willful ignorance and subjectivity to take up the responsible middle position not just for ourselves but for the larger Canadian society.
Remember this now:
‘If the authorities can arrest someone for speaking or writing their viewpoint or perspective today, those same authorities can arrest you for your viewpoint or perspective tomorrow.’
We must not morph into evil to strike down a potential danger. Don’t let the petals of this rose darken
Ultimately, the government is not to blame in all this. This is why simply changing one party for another makes no real different. We dug this hole ourselves through walking in the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. ‘This is a dark forest. In this dark forest one develops a fear of others;and of what others might do.
‘Yet there is another Tree.  We can and need to start right now by turning around and returning to the Tree of Life. Yes. ‘To the One who was Crucified.’ This is where fear departs from us and where His undying love begins to make us into a new person.’
For a reminder of those who knew liberty in themselves:

Charlie Chaplin

You Tube ‘Great Dictator Speech by Charlie Chaplin (Subtitles – Best Version)


John F Kennedy

The Yellow Badge System & the Technocratic Grid

“Las Debanadoras” (‘The Yellow Badge System’) and the Technocratic Grid



“WE can reel you in at any time”





Have we not maybe visited this model before?


Let us look now







The Fornier Register



The Yellow Badge in History


At the time these crosses were known locally as “las debanadoras” – which in Occitan literally meant reels or winding machines. It is thought that this name is derived from the fact that the Cathars compared the cross to a reel and line to which the wearer was tied, and by which the wearer could be reeled in at any time, for a second offense meant the death penalty.
Source: Wiki



The Star Chamber


Magna Carta

The Right of Petition

Habeaus Corpus

Charter of Rights and Freedoms


Which way is ‘UP’ and ‘Why’?


When we decide to ‘write our own rule book’ – we can end up getting ‘pandora’s box’




a state or condition of individuals or society characterized by a breakdown or absence of social norms and values, as in the case of uprooted people.
Consider …
The present generation has been raised in Post-Modernism
We all observe the weeds of confusion
(i.e. There is NO roadmap)
Wanting to serve themselves, they will end up serving – ‘One’
The question is only ‘Who’ this One shall be